The first thing that Gatto does is put ethos to play by establishing this credibility with the audience in a number of ways. Also he was not the only one who was bored as an instructor and if we ask the teachers about their boredom they will blame kids. The kids seemed to be bored because they think that the work is stupid or that they are already aware of how to do it. The fifth point about schools discourage pupils that fall back early on is something I agree with. Having a ground basis for education allows for a more stable and less polarized society. It is no longer possible to be successful like Edison by just inviting a light bulb.
With teachers being bored as well and blaming their students he brings up the question of who really is to blame. According to Gatto, James Conant changed the style of standardized testing, nor the gargantuan high school that warehouse 2,000 to 4,000 students at a time Par. Gatto expresses how that students and teachers are both bored because students are being taught information that they already know, while teachers are bored because they feel that the students have bad attitudes and don't want to learn but just want good grades. Do we really need school? First, though, we must wake up to what our schools really are: laboratories of experimentation on young minds, drill centers for the habits and attitudes that corporate society demands. Salarino and Solanio suggest that his sadness must be due to his commercial investments, for Antonio has dispatched several trade ships to various ports.
The author explains that he isn't against education but the school system. Of course, teachers are themselves products of the same twelve-year compulsory school programs that so thoroughly bore their students, and as school personnel they are trapped inside structures even more rigid than those imposed upon the children. Without these freedom has no meaning. When we go to college we have to figure out the true meaning of education that Gatto is hinting at. He gives examples of famous, intelligent people, such as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, who accomplished great things without getting their education in school. He follows by saying that he believes. Everyone knows that children can be very judgemental, and so if children were allowed to wear their own clothes, children would judge each other and make friends according to what clothes they wore.
School didn't have to train kids in any direct sense to think they should consume nonstop, because it did something even better: it encouraged them not to think at all. According to Inglis, the whole point of the American public school system is to create a division of classes in America, separating public school students into generalyl lower class areas that become the working force of America. . According to him, people may see the key problem of schooling as boredom. This, of course, precludes critical judgment completely.
One afternoon when I was seven I complained to him of boredom, and he batted me hard on the head. It rings a bell and the young man in the middle of writing a poem must close his notebook and move to a different cell where he must memorize that humans and monkeys derive from a common ancestor. Salarino says it is impossible for Antonio not to feel sad at the thought of the perilous ocean sinking his entire investment, but Antonio assures his friends that his business ventures do not depend on the safe passage of any one ship. Although teachers do care and do work very hard the institution is psychopathic, it has no conscience. According to Gatto, this is the government trying to prevent people from becoming too educated by slowing down their learning process and the rate in which they enter working fields.
To that end, a small fraction of the kids will quietly be taught how to manage this continuing project, how to watch over and control a population deliberately dumbed down and declawed in order that government might proceed unchallenged and corporations might never want for obedient labor. This part makes audiences mor e willing to accept the main argument of this article. The solution, I think, is simple and glorious. Society would lose the idea of what a well round student really meant, and so many people would lose that initial motivation to get to know different educational subjects. Children would most likely enjoy dressing the way they want, but teachers and board members would rather see them in uniforms. Again towards the end, the suggestions he provides to help keep children alive and curious are really good.
Although I do not agree with the first point he presented, I feel like there is some truth in the second point- about conformity. Gatto said that according to our cultural traditions schools were made to make good people, good citizens, and each person their personal best. Conant himself, building on the ideas of Horace Mann and others, campaigned tirelessly for an American school system designed along the same lines. Although on the other hand i think school is not only important for education, but also for street smarts. Our world requires us to be thinkers and innovators so we must give our youth the opportunity to fulfill that. Thanks for your efforts here! Gatto is not saying that children do not need to be educated. This means that a content-based curriculum, with a set body of information to be imparted to students, is entirely inappropriate as a means of preparing children for their adult roles.
He argues that people in the past have come along and gone to do extraordinary things in life without a mandatory education. We have become a nation of children, happy to surrender our judgments and our wills to political exhortations and commercial blandishments that would insult actual adults. Whereas kids blame the way that teacher represents the materials. Inglis breaks down the purpose - the actual purpose - of modem schooling into six basic functions, any one of which is enough to curl the hair of those innocent enough to believe the three traditional goals listed earlier: 1 The adjustive or adaptive function. School is a place where kids come to learn, in the first place.